South Dakota regulators approved a smaller Black Hills Energy rate increase on Nov. 4, 2026: about $16.34 a month for a typical residential customer using 650 kWh, starting Dec. 1. The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) accepted a settlement that raises the company’s South Dakota electric revenue by $27.354 million a year. Black Hills had asked for about $50.6 million, or $25.13 a month for a typical home.
The case covers Black Hills Power, Inc., which does business as Black Hills Energy and serves about 75,000 customers in its South Dakota territory, including Rapid City. A second, separate charge for a new power plant is still pending and could start on an interim basis the same day. For Xcel Energy’s 2026 decision and how solar is paid in the state, see our South Dakota electricity rates and solar guide.
What the PUC Approved
According to the PUC’s Nov. 5 news release, the settlement allows Black Hills to “increase electric rates for South Dakota customers by $27.354 million annually.” The PUC says that is “a 21.28% increase in base rate revenue” and “a 13.62% increase in total bills.”
| Item | Figure | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue increase | $27.354 million a year | Approved Nov. 4, 2026 |
| Original request (filed Feb. 19, 2026) | About $50.6 million a year (25.1% of total revenue) | Reduced about 46% |
| Typical residential bill, 650 kWh a month | About +$16.34 a month | Approved |
| Typical residential bill under the original request | +$25.13 a month (25.4%) | Collected as interim rates since Aug. 18 |
| New rates start | Dec. 1, 2026 | Approved |
| Next base rate increase | Not before Aug. 18, 2030 | Settlement term |
Sources: PUC release of Nov. 5, 2026; the PUC’s Nov. 4 meeting agenda; Black Hills’ updated customer notice. The 21.28% applies to base rate revenue only; the 13.62% applies to total bills, which also include other charges.
The settlement was filed Oct. 26 by Black Hills, PUC staff and the South Dakota Large Customer Group, a group of eight large energy users that intervened in the case, according to the agenda. The PUC says the company’s last rate increase was approved “in March of 2015.” Commission Chairman Chris Nelson said that, counting rate changes since what he called the company’s last base rate increase in 2014, the typical residential customer’s increase “averages approximately 3.0% per year,” below average annual inflation of about 3.5%.
The case is Docket EL26-003.
Interim Rates and Your Refund
Black Hills began charging interim rates on Aug. 18, 2026, while the case was pending, at the level of its full request. The company’s interim bill-impact sheet shows the average residential regular-service bill rising from $98.96 to $124.08 under interim rates, the same $25.13 as the full request.
“The approved settlement is less than interim rates,” the PUC says, so the company “agreed to refund customers the difference between interim rates and new rates collected, plus interest.”
Our estimate of the size of that gap, for a typical customer:
- Interim increase: $25.13 a month
- Approved increase: $16.34 a month
- Difference: $25.13 − $16.34 = $8.79 a month over-collected, plus interest
Assumptions: the company’s typical residential customer at 650 kWh a month, regular service. Interim rates ran from Aug. 18 through Nov. 30, about three and a half billing months. The PUC release does not give a refund amount per customer or say on which bill the credit will appear, so treat this as an estimate, not your refund. Customers on total-electric or demand service had different interim increases.
The Separate Lange II Surcharge
The base rate case is not the only change scheduled for Dec. 1. In August, Black Hills filed a second request, Docket EL26-024, to amend its Phase-In Plan Rate (PIPR), a surcharge tied to its new Lange II generating plant in Rapid City.
The company’s application describes Lange II as “a generating plant that will produce a total of 97.4 MW net capacity,” which the application describes as six dual-fuel reciprocating engines. It proposed to increase PIPR revenue “by approximately $39.5 million.” South Dakota Public Broadcasting reported the plant’s cost at $320 million.
On Oct. 30, Black Hills filed a notice of intent to put interim PIPR rates in place “effective December 1, 2026,” designed to recover “approximately $37.5 million in additional annual revenue.” The notice says: “A typical residential customer using approximately 600 kWh per month is expected to experience an increase of approximately $17.26 per month.” The company’s customer notice puts that at $0.02876 per kWh. Black Hills “acknowledges that the interim rates … are subject to refund.”
The PUC has not issued a final decision on the surcharge. The docket page listed it as pending on Nov. 6, 2026, with no hearing or decision date shown.
What a December Bill Could Look Like
If the interim surcharge starts Dec. 1 as Black Hills has noticed, a typical home would see both changes at once. Our rough estimate at 650 kWh a month, regular residential service:
| Step | Monthly bill | How we got it |
|---|---|---|
| Before Aug. 18, 2026 | $98.96 | Company’s average residential regular-service bill |
| Approved base rates, Dec. 1 | About $115.30 | $98.96 + $16.34 |
| Plus interim Lange II surcharge | About $133.99 | 650 kWh × $0.02876 = $18.69 added |
| Change from before Aug. 18 | About +$35.03 (35%) | $133.99 − $98.96 |
This is our estimate, not a company or PUC figure. It combines figures computed at two usage levels (650 kWh for the rate case, 600 kWh for the surcharge, which we scaled by its per-kWh rate), it assumes the $98.96 average bill matches the typical 650 kWh customer, and it leaves out the interim refund credit. The surcharge is interim and could change when the PUC rules. Black Hills’ application also says its new PIPR allocation method “ties to Docket No. EL26-003,” so the final surcharge may reflect the settlement.
Compared with the interim bill customers have paid since August ($124.08), the estimate is about $9.91 higher. For how interim rates, settlements and riders fit together, see how electric rate cases work.
What It Means if You Have or Want Solar
South Dakota does not have net metering. The PUC’s solar FAQ states that “South Dakota does not compensate solar generation at a net metered rate.” It says “the minimum rate paid” for power you send to the grid “is referred to as the avoided cost,” meaning what the utility would otherwise spend to generate or buy that energy. Solar you use at home as it is produced offsets the full retail rate; exported power may be credited at as little as avoided cost.
Two things follow for Black Hills customers:
- Per-kWh charges are what solar can offset. The interim Lange II surcharge is billed per kWh ($0.02876 in the company’s notice), so each kWh your panels supply directly to your home avoids it. Exported kWh do not.
- We do not yet know how the base increase is split. The PUC release does not say how much of the $16.34 is in the fixed customer charge versus per-kWh energy charges. Fixed charges cannot be offset by solar. Our guide to fixed charges and solar savings explains why that split matters.
Without net metering, sizing a system to your daytime use generally gets the most value from each kWh. If an installer’s quote assumes every kWh is worth the full retail rate, ask how it values exports. Our payback guide walks through the math.
What to Check on Your Bill
- December bill: new base rates for service from Dec. 1.
- Refund credit: the interim refund, with interest. Ask Black Hills when it will appear if you do not see it.
- PIPR or Phase-In Plan Rate line: whether the Lange II interim surcharge has started.
For help reading those lines, see how to read your electric bill.
Sources and verification
| Important claim | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|
| $27.354 million approved; 21.28% base revenue; 13.62% total bills; about $16.34 at 650 kWh; Dec. 1, 2026; about $50.6 million requested; reduced about 46%; refund with interest; no base increase before Aug. 18, 2030; approved at Nov. 4 meeting | South Dakota PUC release, Nov. 5, 2026 | Verified |
| Request filed Feb. 19, 2026; 25.1%; $25.13 at 650 kWh; settlement filed Oct. 26 by company, staff and Large Customer Group; about 75,000 customers | PUC agenda, Nov. 4, 2026; updated customer notice | Verified |
| Interim bills: $98.96 to $124.08 (+$25.13), effective Aug. 18, 2026 | Black Hills interim filing, Attachment 2 | Verified |
| Lange II 97.4 MW net; PIPR increase of about $39.5 million requested | EL26-024 application | Verified |
| Interim PIPR from Dec. 1, 2026; about $37.5 million; about $17.26 at 600 kWh; subject to refund | Black Hills notice, Oct. 30, 2026 | Verified |
| $0.02876 per kWh | PIPR customer notice | Verified |
| No net metering; minimum export rate is avoided cost | South Dakota PUC solar FAQ | Verified |
| Lange II cost about $320 million | SDPB, Aug. 26, 2026 | Qualified (news report) |
| Refund gap, December bill estimate | Our arithmetic from the figures above | Calculated |
Checked Nov. 6, 2026. The base rate figures are approved. The Lange II surcharge is a pending request with interim rates noticed by the company, not a PUC decision.
Frequently asked questions
How much is the Black Hills Energy rate increase in South Dakota?
The PUC says a typical residential customer using 650 kWh a month will see a bill increase of about $16.34. Overall, the approved settlement raises base rate revenue 21.28% and total bills 13.62%.
When do the new Black Hills Energy rates take effect?
December 1, 2026, according to the South Dakota PUC.
Will I get a refund for the interim rates?
Yes. Interim rates based on the full request took effect Aug. 18, 2026. Because the approved rates are lower, the company agreed to refund the difference plus interest. At the typical usage level, the interim increase was $25.13 a month versus $16.34 approved, a gap of $8.79 a month (our arithmetic). Your amount depends on your usage.
Is the Lange II surcharge part of this increase?
No. It is a separate request in Docket EL26-024 and had no final decision as of Nov. 6, 2026. Black Hills has filed notice that it intends to collect it on an interim basis from Dec. 1, subject to refund, at about $17.26 a month for a typical customer using 600 kWh.
Does South Dakota have net metering for solar?
No. The South Dakota PUC says the state does not compensate solar generation at a net metered rate. The PUC describes the minimum rate paid for exported power as the utility's avoided cost, so solar saves the most when you use the power at home as it is produced.
