<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Solar Costs &amp; Incentives on Solar Examiner</title><link>https://solarexaminer.com/categories/costs-incentives/</link><description>Recent content in Solar Costs &amp; Incentives on Solar Examiner</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Solar Examiner</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://solarexaminer.com/categories/costs-incentives/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Treasury's new ITC guidance narrows the domestic-content bonus — here's who still qualifies</title><link>https://solarexaminer.com/posts/treasury-itc-guidance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://solarexaminer.com/posts/treasury-itc-guidance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Treasury Department&amp;rsquo;s latest safe-harbor guidance raises the domestic manufactured-product threshold for the Investment Tax Credit&amp;rsquo;s 10% domestic-content bonus, a change that will affect utility-scale developers more than residential installers.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;For homeowners, the residential system side of the credit is untouched. The change targets the adder that developers claim on top of the base 30% credit, and mostly affects sourcing decisions for inverters and racking rather than panels themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-actually-changed"&gt;What actually changed&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The prior safe harbor let developers count certain steel components toward the threshold using a simplified cost method. The new guidance requires more granular documentation of where that steel was melted and poured, not just fabricated.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Community solar subscriptions grew 14% this year — but cancellations are rising too</title><link>https://solarexaminer.com/posts/community-solar-subscription-report/</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://solarexaminer.com/posts/community-solar-subscription-report/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Community solar subscriber counts grew 14% year-over-year through Q3, continuing a multi-year expansion into states that opened programs to non-utility developers.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;div class="stat-strip"&gt;&#10;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="stat-num"&gt;+14%&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="stat-label"&gt;subscriber growth, YoY&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#10;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="stat-num"&gt;9%&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="stat-label"&gt;annual cancellation rate&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#10;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="stat-num"&gt;19&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="stat-label"&gt;states with active programs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#10;&lt;/div&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The growth headline hides a churn story. Roughly 9% of subscribers cancel within their first year, and the most commonly cited reason in exit surveys we reviewed was a savings guarantee that turned out to be a projection, not a contractual floor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>